Screener
CLOI vs PFIG
VanEck CLO ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.14% less per year.
- CLOI is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $113M |
| Since | 2022 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and PFIG
Explore further