Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CNQQ vs CNYA

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF

CNQQ

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$26M

CNYA

iShares MSCI China A ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$242M

Key differences

Both CNQQ and CNYA are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: CNYA costs 0.15% less per year.

  • CNYA costs 0.15% less per year.
  • CNYA is much larger than CNQQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • CNYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CNQQCNYA
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$26M$242M
Since20252016
Dividend yield1.76%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificasia pacific
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+31.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+10.3%
CAGR 5YN/A-1.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.38
Volatility 1Y17.67%
Max drawdown-17.82%-49.48%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to CNQQ and CNYA