Screener
CNQQ vs ECNS
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both CNQQ and ECNS are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: ECNS costs 0.16% less per year.
- ECNS costs 0.16% less per year.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNQQ | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $71M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -17.82% | -63.44% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.