Screener
CNQQ vs ANEW
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
Key differences
Both CNQQ and ANEW are equity ETFs. CNQQ charges 0.75% a year and ANEW 0.45%. The main difference: ANEW costs 0.30% less per year.
- ANEW costs 0.30% less per year.
- CNQQ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANEW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNQQ | ANEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $8M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +2.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -17.82% | -39.87% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.