Screener
CNYA vs ECH
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Chile ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and ECH are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and ECH 0.59%. The main difference: CNYA covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECH covers Latin America.
- CNYA covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECH covers Latin America.
- ECH is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ECH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | ECH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 1.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | latin america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 25.09% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -66.89% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.