Screener
CNYA vs EEMA
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and EEMA are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: EEMA costs 0.11% less per year.
- EEMA costs 0.11% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -44.18% |
Similar to CNYA and EEMA
Explore further