Screener
CNYA vs IEMG
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.51% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $238M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.80% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.5% | +49.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 19.35% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CNYA and IEMG
Explore further