Screener
CNYA vs IGF
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and IGF are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and IGF 0.39%. The main difference: CNYA covers the Asia-Pacific region; IGF covers global markets.
- CNYA covers the Asia-Pacific region; IGF covers global markets.
- IGF costs 0.21% less per year.
- IGF is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 2.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 10.52% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -42.11% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.