Screener
CNYA vs URTH
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.36% less per year.
- URTH is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CNYA covers emerging markets markets; URTH covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $238M | $9.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.80% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.5% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.18% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CNYA and URTH
Explore further