Screener
COPJ vs SIL
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- SIL costs 0.10% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than COPJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SIL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPJ | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 11.05% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.6% | +110.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +43.4% | +48.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.67% | 49.93% |
| Max drawdown | -32.28% | -63.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPJ and SIL
Explore further