Screener
SIL vs SGDJ
Global X Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDJ costs 0.15% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than SGDJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SIL follows a index tracking strategy; SGDJ uses active selection.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIL | SGDJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $330M |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 7.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +110.6% | +91.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.8% | +48.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.93% | 48.45% |
| Max drawdown | -63.04% | -59.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SIL and SGDJ
Explore further