Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SIL vs COPP

Global X Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Copper Miners ETF

SIL

Global X Silver Miners ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$5.3B

COPP

Sprott Copper Miners ETF

Sprott

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$269M

Key differences

  • SIL is significantly larger than COPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SILCOPP
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.66%
Fund size (AUM)$5.3B$269M
Since20102024
Dividend yield1.12%2.21%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+110.6%+99.5%
CAGR 3Y+48.8%N/A
CAGR 5Y+14.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.09N/A
Volatility 1Y49.93%42.29%
Max drawdown-63.04%-44.37%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SIL and COPP