Screener
COPP vs SGDJ
Sprott Copper Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDJ costs 0.16% less per year.
- COPP follows a index tracking strategy; SGDJ uses active selection.
- SGDJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPP | SGDJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $269M | $330M |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 7.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.5% | +91.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +48.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.29% | 48.45% |
| Max drawdown | -44.37% | -59.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPP and SGDJ
Explore further