Screener
COPP vs SGDM
Sprott Copper Miners ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.20% less per year.
- COPP follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- SGDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| COPP | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $269M | $660M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.5% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.29% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -44.37% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to COPP and SGDM
Explore further