Screener
CORB vs KAT
AB Core Bond ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- CORB costs 0.47% less per year.
- CORB is classified as fixed income, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CORB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CORB | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $999M | $688M |
| Since | 2002 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.06% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.08% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CORB and KAT
Explore further