Screener
CORO vs FISR
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF vs State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- FISR costs 0.05% less per year.
- CORO is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CORO is classified as alternative, while FISR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CORO follows a active selection strategy; FISR uses index tracking.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CORO | FISR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $514M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.3% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.46% | 4.41% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -20.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CORO and FISR
Explore further