Screener
FISR vs BFLX
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.10% less per year.
- FISR is classified as fixed income, while BFLX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FISR covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | — |
| Since | 2019 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -0.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and BFLX
Explore further