Screener
CRED vs RECS
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Key differences
- RECS costs 0.18% less per year.
- RECS is significantly larger than CRED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RECS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CRED | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $5.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.9% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.4% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.72% | 11.92% |
| Max drawdown | -17.59% | -34.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CRED and RECS
Explore further