Screener
RECS vs REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- RECS is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RECS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RECS | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.4B | $284M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 11.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.29% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RECS and REVS
Explore further