Screener
CSHI vs QQQH
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF vs NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- CSHI costs 0.30% less per year.
- CSHI is significantly larger than QQQH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CSHI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSHI | QQQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $363M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.94% | 9.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | -5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.87% | 9.69% |
| Max drawdown | -1.69% | -53.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSHI and QQQH
Explore further