Screener
CSHI vs QQQI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF vs NEOS NASDAQ-100(R) High Income ETF
Key differences
- CSHI costs 0.30% less per year.
- QQQI is significantly larger than CSHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSHI | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $11.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.94% | 13.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.34 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.87% | 13.06% |
| Max drawdown | -1.69% | -20.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSHI and QQQI
Explore further