Screener
CSHP vs LDUR
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF vs PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- CSHP costs 0.34% less per year.
- LDUR is significantly larger than CSHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSHP covers global markets; LDUR covers north america.
- LDUR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSHP | LDUR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $190M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.10% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.33% | 1.57% |
| Max drawdown | -0.08% | -8.68% |
Similar to CSHP and LDUR
Explore further