Screener
CSHP vs MINT
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- CSHP costs 0.16% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than CSHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSHP covers global markets; MINT covers north america.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSHP | MINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $190M | $15.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.10% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 4.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.33% | 0.27% |
| Max drawdown | -0.08% | -4.62% |
Similar to CSHP and MINT
Explore further