Screener
CSM vs BGRO
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
Both CSM and BGRO are alternative ETFs. CSM charges 0.45% a year and BGRO 0.55%. The main difference: CSM costs 0.10% less per year.
- CSM costs 0.10% less per year.
- CSM is much larger than BGRO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSM | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $524M | $10M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.19% | 18.76% |
| Max drawdown | -36.11% | -24.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.