Screener
CTA vs HARD
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
Key differences
- CTA is significantly larger than HARD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTA is classified as alternative, while HARD is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTA | HARD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $118M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.03% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.72% | 26.20% |
| Max drawdown | -18.07% | -13.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTA and HARD
Explore further