Screener
HARD vs ISMF
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- HARD is classified as commodity, while ISMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $57M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | — | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and ISMF
Explore further