Screener
HARD vs IMF
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.13% less per year.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while IMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $301M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and IMF
Explore further