Screener
CTEC vs CCNR
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.11% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTEC follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $394M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +124.6% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.99% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and CCNR
Explore further