Screener
CTEC vs QCLN
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.09% less per year.
- QCLN is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QCLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $739M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +131.2% | +118.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.8% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.90% | 34.72% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -71.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and QCLN
Explore further