Screener
CTEC vs PBD
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.25% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $208M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +124.6% | +88.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.99% | 23.23% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and PBD
Explore further