Screener
CTEC vs SMOG
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.14% less per year.
- SMOG is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEC | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $152M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +124.6% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.99% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -81.58% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEC and SMOG
Explore further