Screener
CTEX vs PBD
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- CTEX costs 0.17% less per year.
- PBD is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTEX covers north america markets; PBD covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEX | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $208M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +156.4% | +95.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.38% | 23.36% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEX and PBD
Explore further