Screener
CVY vs PGF
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGF costs 0.66% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than CVY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CVY is classified as mixed asset, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CVY covers global markets; PGF covers north america.
- CVY follows a active selection strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CVY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CVY | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $719M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.74% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.04% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -50.47% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CVY and PGF
Explore further