Screener
CZA vs RWJ
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWJ costs 0.30% less per year.
- RWJ is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +37.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 19.42% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -51.33% |
Similar to CZA and RWJ
Explore further