Screener
CZA vs RPV
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
Both CZA and RPV are equity ETFs. CZA charges 0.69% a year and RPV 0.35%. The main difference: RPV costs 0.34% less per year.
- RPV costs 0.34% less per year.
- RPV is much larger than CZA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -50.67% |
Similar to CZA and RPV
Explore further