Screener
CZA vs PWV
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- PWV costs 0.14% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 9.37% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -37.67% |
Similar to CZA and PWV
Explore further