Screener
CZAR vs CGIE
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Capital Group International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.19% less per year.
- CGIE is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR covers north america markets; CGIE covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | CGIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -13.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and CGIE
Explore further