Screener
DBJP vs EWV
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
Key differences
- DBJP costs 0.50% less per year.
- DBJP is significantly larger than EWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBJP follows a index tracking strategy; EWV uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBJP | EWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $613M | $7M |
| Since | 2011 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | 4.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.0% | -44.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.5% | -28.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | -18.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.09% | 40.44% |
| Max drawdown | -31.30% | -90.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBJP and EWV
Explore further