Screener
DBJP vs EZJ
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
Key differences
- DBJP costs 0.72% less per year.
- DBJP is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBJP follows a index tracking strategy; EZJ uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DBJP | EZJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $613M | $13M |
| Since | 2011 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.0% | +57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.5% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.9% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.09% | 40.31% |
| Max drawdown | -31.30% | -58.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DBJP and EZJ
Explore further