Screener
EZJ vs EWJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
- EWJ costs 0.68% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; EWJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $21.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 4.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 19.81% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -33.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and EWJ
Explore further