Screener
DCMT vs HARD
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF vs Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
Key differences
- DCMT costs 0.12% less per year.
- HARD is significantly larger than DCMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DCMT | HARD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $118M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 26.36% |
| Max drawdown | -11.95% | -13.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DCMT and HARD
Explore further