Screener
HARD vs NBCM
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Neuberger Commodity Strategy ETF
Key differences
- NBCM costs 0.13% less per year.
- NBCM is significantly larger than HARD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while NBCM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, NBCM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- NBCM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | NBCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $424M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 6.44% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.36% | 17.50% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -12.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and NBCM
Explore further