Screener
DDNQ vs NMAR
Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- NMAR is significantly larger than DDNQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DDNQ | NMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $93M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.30% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -9.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DDNQ and NMAR
Explore further