Screener
NMAR vs NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
Key differences
- NOCT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NMAR | NOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $237M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.4% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.30% | 7.65% |
| Max drawdown | -9.99% | -16.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NMAR and NOCT
Explore further