Screener
DEEF vs ROAM
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- DEEF costs 0.20% less per year.
- DEEF covers global markets; ROAM covers emerging markets.
- DEEF follows a index enhanced strategy; ROAM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEEF | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $106M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.59% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -36.47% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEEF and ROAM
Explore further