Screener
DEUS vs OMFL
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- DEUS costs 0.12% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than DEUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DEUS is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- DEUS follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, DEUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEUS | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.12% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -40.47% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEUS and OMFL
Explore further