Screener
DEUS vs OMFS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- DEUS costs 0.22% less per year.
- DEUS follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| DEUS | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $275M |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.12% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -40.47% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DEUS and OMFS
Explore further