Screener
DFAC vs DFAW
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF vs Dimensional World Equity ETF
Key differences
- DFAC costs 0.07% less per year.
- DFAC is significantly larger than DFAW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAC follows a active selection strategy; DFAW uses index tracking.
- DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFAC | DFAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -23.11% | -16.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFAC and DFAW
Explore further