Screener
DFSD vs GIGB
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.08% less per year.
- DFSD is significantly larger than GIGB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFSD covers global markets; GIGB covers north america.
- DFSD follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| DFSD | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.6B | $907M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.92% | 4.40% |
| Max drawdown | -8.45% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DFSD and GIGB
Explore further