Screener
GIGB vs DUSB
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.07% less per year.
- GIGB follows a index tracking strategy; DUSB uses active selection.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GIGB | DUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $907M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.70% | 4.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.40% | 0.43% |
| Max drawdown | -22.25% | -0.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GIGB and DUSB
Explore further